Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
Gerechtshof Den Haag, 18 января 2022, n° 200.297.480-01
korte termijn van één maand voor instellen hoger beroep in artikel 5:130 lid 3 BW; te laat, niet-ontvankelijk.
-
Rechtbank Rotterdam, 18 января 2022, n° C/10/612071 / FA RK 21-620
Hoofdverblijfplaats minderjarige bij vrouw bepaald. Beslissing ten aanzien van gezag en de zorgregeling (dan wel omgangsregeling) pro forma aangehouden in afwachting van hulpverleningstraject Ouderschapsbemiddeling.
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 18 января 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 93 (Admin)
MR JUSTICE FORDHAM: 1. This is an application, pursuant to paragraph 14(2)(3) of Schedule 2 to the Social Workers Regulations 2018, for an 8-month extension (to 18.9.22) of an interim...
-
Employment Appeal Tribunal, 18 января 2022, n° [2022] EAT 13
SUMMARY TOPIC NUMBER 8 – Practice and Procedure; Unless Order The Tribunal made a Rule 38 Unless Order which bore to be in accordance with the power conferred by Rule...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 18 января 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 85 (Admin)
MR JUSTICE FORDHAM: Introduction 1. This is a case about Government policy, rough sleepers and the pandemic. It comes before the Court as a claim for judicial review, with permission...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 18 января 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 83 (Admin)
MR JUSTICE FORDHAM : Introduction 1. This is an application for permission for judicial review in an extradition case, which Jay J directed (by Order 3 November 2021) be determined...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 18 января 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 8
Remote hand-down: This judgment was handed down remotely at 10:30am on Tuesday 18 January 2022 by circulation to the parties or their representatives by email and by release to BAILII...
-
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 18 января 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Crim 44
1. LORD JUSTICE HOLROYDE: In 2014 this applicant pleaded guilty to a phone hacking offence. He was sentenced to 2 months' imprisonment, suspended for 12 months, and ordered to carry...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 18 января 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 84 (Admin)
MR JUSTICE FORDHAM: Introduction 1. This is an extradition appeal on Article 8 ECHR grounds. The hearing was in-person. The Appellant is aged 47 and is wanted for extradition to...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 18 января 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 82 (Admin)
MR JUSTICE FORDHAM: Introduction 1. The substantive issue raised in this claim for judicial review is this: whether the 26 March 2020 Covid-19 prohibition on collective worship (“PCW”), as maintained...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 18 января 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 39 (Admin)
Mr Justice Eyre : Introduction. 1. Mr. Philip Ryan is the sole director of and shareholder in each appellant. The respondent council issued summonses against each appellant seeking liability orders...
-
Employment Appeal Tribunal, 18 января 2022, n° [2022] EAT 6
SUMMARY WORKER STATUS The respondent in the employment tribunal operated the Mytaxi App. From 2014 the claimant worked full time in business on his own account as a black-cab (Hackney...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 18 января 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 80 (Admin)
MR JUSTICE FORDHAM : Introduction 1. This is an appeal in an extradition case. The mode of hearing was in-person. The Appellant is aged 41 and is wanted for extradition...
-
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber), 18 января 2022, n° [2022] UKUT 60 (AAC)
The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 21 October 2020 under number EA/2019/0275 was not made in error...
-
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 18 января 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Crim 72
LADY JUSTICE CARR: Introduction 1. This is the renewed application of two applicants, Matthew Sutherland ("Sutherland"), now 45, and Mohammed Khan ("Khan"), now 53, for permission to appeal against their...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 18 января 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 21
Covid-19 Protocol: This judgment was handed down remotely by circulation to the parties’ representatives by email, release to BAILII. The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be 10:00am...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 января 2022, n° 19473/17.6T8LSB.L1.S1
Relator: PEDRO DE LIMA GON?ALVES. I. A jurisprud?ncia alerta para a necessidade de, em sede de qualifica??o da obriga??o assumida pelo m?dico como de meios ou de resultado, se adotar...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 января 2022, n° 3825/21.0T9CSC-A.S2
Relator: EDUARDO LOUREIRO. I - O art. 31.?, n.? 1 da CRP figura o direito ? provid?ncia de habeas corpus como direito fundamental contra o abuso de poder por virtude...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 января 2022, n° 6798/16.7T8LSB-A.L2.S1
Relator: JORGE DIAS. I - A admissibilidade do recurso de revista, no caso de o ac?rd?o da Rela??o ter confirmado, por unanimidade, a decis?o da 1? inst?ncia, est? dependente do...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 января 2022, n° 235/14.9T8PVZ.P1.S1
Relator: JORGE DIAS. I - Quando se verifica dupla conformidade entre as decis?es das Inst?ncias, impeditiva da admissibilidade da revista normal, n?o tendo sido requerida a revista excecional, a mera...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 января 2022, n° 155/07.3TBTVR.E1.S1
Relator: JORGE DIAS. I - Impugnar-se o uso de uma norma por se entender que n?o tem aplica??o no caso concreto, ? coisa distinta do que reagir contra a aplica??o...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 января 2022, n° 19/20.5YLPRT.L1.S1
Relator: MARIA JO?O VAZ TOM?. I. Conforme o art. 615.?, n.? 1, al. c), 1.? parte, do CPC, ?? nula a senten?a quando os fundamentos estejam em oposi??o com a...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 января 2022, n° 400/20.0T8CHV-C.G1.S1
Relator: FERNANDO SAM?ES. I. Nas execu??es, atento o regime espec?fico previsto nos art.?s 852.? e 854.?, ambos do CPC, apenas cabe revista, nos termos gerais, dos ac?rd?os da Rela??o proferidos...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 января 2022, n° 889/18.7T8EPS.P1.S1
Relator: ISA?AS P?DUA. I - Encontrando-se uma cl?usula inserida nas condi??es gerais de um contrato padronizado, ? sobre a parte que dela pretende prevalecer-se, e de modo exclui-la do regime...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 января 2022, n° 16678/16.0T8LSB.L1.S1
Relator: ISA?AS P?DUA. I - Do art?. 682? do CPC ressalta, de forma clara, a distin??o fundamental entre quest?o de facto e quest?o de direito, fixando-se nele a regra segundo...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 января 2022, n° 369/19.3T8PNF.P1.S1
Relator: ANT?NIO MAGALH?ES. I. A an?lise cr?tica da prova exigida nos termos do n.? 4 do artigo 607? do CPC, aplic?vel ? Rela??o, por for?a do n? 2 do art....
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 января 2022, n° 701/19.0T8EVR.E1.S1
Relator: MARIA JO?O VAZ TOM?. I. Nos termos do art. 652.?, n.? 1, al. b), do CPC, deve admitir-se a revista regra na parte do ac?rd?o recorrido em que se...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 января 2022, n° 9317/18.7T8PRT.P1.S1
Relator: MARIA JO?O VAZ TOM?. I. De acordo com a interpreta??o que tem sido feita do art. 854.? do CPC, n?o cabe revista (a n?o ser nos casos em que...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 января 2022, n° 1560/13.1TBVRL-M.G1.S2
Relator: MARIA JO?O VAZ TOM?. I. A norma do art. 370.?, n.? 2, do CPC, n?o permite o recurso para o STJ das decis?es proferidas nos procedimentos cautelares, ressalvados os...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 января 2022, n° 3495/19.5T8PRT.P1.S1
Relator: FERNANDO SAM?ES. I. Configura um contrato de presta??o de servi?os at?pico o contrato celebrado pelas partes, em que a presta??o essencial de uma delas se traduz no resultado de...