Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1711 (Comm)
(Remote Hearing) MRS JUSTICE COCKERILL: 1 Despite Mr Hossain’s very clear and reassuring and skilful arguments, I am going to grant permission to appeal in relation to grounds 2 to...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 232
Lord Justice Newey and Sir Launcelot Henderson : I.Introduction and background 1. This appeal raises issues about the period of limitation applicable to a claim brought in the High Court...
-
High Court (Family Division), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 396 (Fam)
Mr Justice Peel : 1. The child who is the subject of these 1980 Hague Convention proceedings is 7 years old; I shall refer to him as “Z”. The application...
-
Employment Appeal Tribunal, 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EAT 36
SUMMARY UNFAIR DISMISSAL For the purposes of the law of unfair dismissal, section 95(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996 provides that the concept of dismissal includes a case in which the...
-
High Court (Planning Court), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 390 (Admin)
Mr. Justice Holgate: Introduction 1. On 12 November 2018 the defendant, Canterbury City Council (“CCC”) granted outline planning permission (“the OPP”) on land at Cockering Farm, Thanington, a site lying...
-
Employment Appeal Tribunal, 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EAT 32
(1) the ET’s finding that the allegations as a whole were made in good faith could not be reconciled with the finding that she had exaggerated and distorted matters and...
-
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] UKUT 57 (AAC)
The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 5 November 2020 under number SC322/19/02588 was made in error of...
-
Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] UKUT 50 (LC)
Introduction 1. The issue in this appeal is whether a former office building occupied by “property guardians” was a house in multiple occupation (HMO), applying the standard test in section...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 404 (Admin)
MR TIM SMITH (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge): Introduction. 1. This claim concerns a challenge to the grant of planning permission by the Defendant. The planning permission in...
-
First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] UKFTT 148 (TC)
Introduction 1. With the consent of the parties, the form of the hearing was a video hearing using the Tribunal video platform/etc. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it...
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 409 (Comm)
Mrs Justice Cockerill: (A) INTRODUCTION (B) BACKGROUND (i) Factual Background (1) The Policy (2) COVID-19 Pandemic and Associated Restrictions (3) The Claim under the Policy (ii) Legal Background (1) FCA...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 233
LORD JUSTICE COULSON : Background Matters 1. On 16 February 2022, I heard the oral application for permission to appeal against the orders of Mr Justice Cavanagh (“the judge”) dated...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 229
Covid 19 Protocol: This judgment was handed down remotely by circulation to the parties' representatives by email and release to Bailii. The date for hand-down is deemed to be on...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 411 (QB)
Mrs Justice Collins Rice: Introduction 1. There is considerable litigation history between the parties. It has its origins in events in 2017. The Respondent was a newly-qualified solicitor employed and...
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 799 (Comm)
JUDGE PELLING: 1 The issue I now have to resolve concerns the cost of and occasioned by an application for security. 2 The circumstances leading to this particular hearing are...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 231
Lord Justice Males: 1. This appeal arises out of negligent misrepresentations concerning the vessel’s fuel consumption made by the Owner of the VLCC “C CHALLENGER” during negotiations for a two-year...
-
High Court (Business List), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1236 (Ch)
1. THE MASTER: At the moment, I am not going to order an issue for disclosure in terms of issue 18, either as formulated in the DRD that is actually...
-
Rechtbank Noord-Holland, 24 февраля 2022, n° 15-067893-21 (P)
Vrijspraak van ontucht met een minderjarige. Aangeefster heeft met name in het informatieve gesprek weinig specifieke en contextuele details met betrekking tot het misbruik genoemd. De daarop volgende verklaringen van...
-
Raad van State, 24 февраля 2022, n° 202100625/1/V3
Bij besluiten van 23 december 2020 heeft de staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid aanvragen van de vreemdelingen om hun een verblijfsvergunning asiel voor bepaalde tijd te verlenen opnieuw niet in...
-
Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa, 24 февраля 2022, n° 74/19.0YUSTR.L1-PICRS
Relator: CARLOS M. G. DE MELO MARINHO. I.?N?o se aplicam directamente aos processos de contra-ordena??o os princ?pios constitucionais do processo penal (ou, dizendo conforme antes descrito, n?o tem aplica??o, no...
-
Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa, 24 февраля 2022, n° 71/18.3YUSTR-M.L1-PICRS
Relator: ANA M?NICA MENDON?A PAV?O. A apreens?o de mensagens de correio electr?nico efectuada em buscas levadas a cabo pela Autoridade da Concorr?ncia no ?mbito de processo contraordenacional encontra suporte no...
-
Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa, 24 февраля 2022, n° 3553/19.6T9LSB.L1-9
Relator: MARGARIDA VIEIRA DE ALMEIDA. I-Uma vez que os ju?zos e considera??es ofensivos da honra e considera??o do assistente lhe foram dirigidos por causa do exerc?cio das fun??es de Ministro/Juiz...
-
Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa, 24 февраля 2022, n° 157/21.7PGCSC.L1-9
Relator: MARIA DO ROS?RIO SILVA MARTINS. I?A pr?tica do crime de condu??o de ve?culo em estado de embriaguez apenas pode ser provada atrav?s de prova pericial, mais propriamente, um teste...
-
Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa, 24 февраля 2022, n° 4154/15.3T8LSB-D.L1-2
Relator: ANT?NIO MOREIRA. A preclus?o do direito de requerer a dispensa do pagamento do remanescente da taxa de justi?a, a que se reporta o n? 7 do artigo 6? do...
-
Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa, 24 февраля 2022, n° 96/20.9PHOER.L1-9
Relator: CALHEIROS DA GAMA. I- Se o Tribunal a quo n?o pronunciou, deferindo ou indeferindo expressamente o requerido na contesta??o do arguido para que fosse submetido a per?cia psicol?gica para...
-
Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa, 24 февраля 2022, n° 20599/10.2T2SNT-B.L1-2
Relator: ARLINDO CRUA. Sum?rio I?A prescri??o configura-se como uma excep??o perempt?ria, assumindo a natureza de um facto obstativo do exerc?cio de um direito ? cf., o n?. 3, do art?....
-
Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa, 24 февраля 2022, n° 685/18.1PFLRS-A.L1-9
Relator: GUILHERME CASTANHEIRA. I-Apenas o despacho de convers?o, e n?o tamb?m o seu contradit?rio, por consubstanciar uma modifica??o do conte?do decis?rio da senten?a, t?m de ser notificados ao arguido e...
-
Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa, 24 февраля 2022, n° 3/22.4JAFUN-A.L1-9
Relator: FRANCISCO SOUSA PEREIRA. I-Nos termos do disposto no aludido artigo 178.?, n.? 1, do C?digo de Processo Penal, ?S?o apreendidos (...) vantagens relacionadas com a pr?tica de um facto...
-
Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa, 24 февраля 2022, n° 169/19.0T8EPS.L1-2
Relator: NELSON BORGES CARNEIRO. I ? No sistema portugu?s, sendo o patrim?nio do devedor a garantia geral da obriga??o, n?o obstante a execu??o da hipoteca, se remanescer a tal execu??o...
-
Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa, 24 февраля 2022, n° 6900/21.7T8LRS-B.L1-2
Relator: ORLANDO NASCIMENTO. Os embargos de terceiro n?o s?o o instrumento processual pr?prio para a defesa de um direito de cr?dito com g?nese num documento particular de ?Reserva-antecipa??o de cumprimento...