Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
Rechtbank Rotterdam, 12 décembre 2022, n° 10060250 VZ VERZ 22-10927
Uitzendkracht heeft geen arbeidsovereenkomst voor onbepaalde tijd met inlener na aaneengesloten inleenperiode van ongeveer 13 jaar. Uitzendrichtlijn. Geen misbruik. Bepalen maximale termijn inlening en sancties is een taak voor de...
-
Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden, 12 décembre 2022, n° 200.312.698
Verplichte coronatest medewerkers kinderopvang. Ontbinding op e-grond in verband met weigering door werkgever verplichte PCR-test (art. 7:671b lid 1 BW in samenhang met artikel 7:669 lid 3, onder e BW)....
-
Rechtbank Den Haag, 12 décembre 2022, n° AWB - 21 _ 8430
Bodemprocedure. Verzoek om schadevergoeding en verzoek om informatie.
-
Cour suprême administrative de Finlande, 12 décembre 2022, n° 0062/1/21
I det miljötillstånd som gällde A Ab:s energiproducerande anläggningar ingick tillståndsvillkor som riktade sig till A Ab gällande upplag av träbaserade bränslen utomhus och behandlingen av dagvattnet från dem. A...
-
Cour suprême administrative de Finlande, 12 décembre 2022, n° 21810/2020
B är en öppen luxemburgsk avtalsbaserad specialplaceringsfond som investerar i fastigheter. Fondens enda delfond är den luxemburgska avtalsbaserade delfonden A. A har investerat över en femtedel av sin förmögenhet i...
-
Cour suprême administrative de Finlande, 12 décembre 2022, n° 23165/2021
B är en luxemburgsk avtalsbaserad FCP-paraplyfond. B:s delfond A är en öppen avtalsbaserad förmögenhetsmassa som investerar sina medel huvudsakligen i fastighetsobjekt. B har endast en direkt fondandelsägare. I ärendet skulle...
-
Rechtbank Gelderland, 12 décembre 2022, n° C/05/400232 / FZ RK 22/518 & C/05/405974 / FZ RK 22/1892
Kinderalimentatie. De werkelijke woonlast van de man bedraagt door dubbele woonlasten meer dan het dubbele van de forfaitaire woonlast. De man zit hierdoor in de financiële problemen. De rechtbank houdt...
-
Tribunal du travail de Finlande, 12 décembre 2022, n° 20082/03.04.02.02.00/2021
Kuukausipalkkainen työntekijä oli vaihtanut teknologiateollisuuden työehtosopimuksen mukaisia palvelusvuosilisiään palkallisiin vapaapäiviin. Tuomiosta tarkemmin ilmenevin perustein katsottiin, että palvelusvuosivapaan pitäminen ei vähentänyt oikeutta työajan tasaamisvapaisiin. Työnantaja ja työnantajaliitto tuomittiin hyvityssakkoihin. Asia Työaika...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 3171 (Admin)
Mr Justice Cavanagh: Introduction 1. This is a statutory appeal, brought under section 121 of the Housing and Regeneration Act 2008 (“the 2008 Act”), against the decision of the Respondent...
-
First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] UKFTT 471 (TC)
Introduction 1. This appeal concerns the appellant’s claim to interest pursuant to section 78 Value Added Tax Act 1994 (“VATA 1994”). It arises following repayment by HMRC of overpaid output...
-
High Court (Family Division), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 3692 (Fam)
1 This is my judgment in relation to this application for an inward return order. I set out the background in very brief summary. In July 2021, the mother, T,...
-
Family Court (B - district and circuit judges), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] EWFC 193 (B)
His Honour Judge Willans: The essential issues at the heart of this case 1. In this judgment I am asked to reach decisions as to the following questions: (a) How...
-
High Court (Insolvency and Companies List), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 3234 (Ch)
Lady Justice Falk DBE Monday, 12 December 2022 (15:43 pm) Ruling by LADYJUSTICE FALK DBE Pre-judgment interest: period of accrual 1. The first point to address is the period for...
-
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] UKFTT 462 (GRC)
1. The appeal is dismissed. REASONS Mode of hearing 2. The parties and the Tribunal agreed that this matter was suitable for determination on the papers in accordance with rule...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 3176 (Admin)
Mr Justice Hilliard: Introduction 1. This is a Case Stated by District Judge (Magistrates’ Courts) Gwyn Jones in respect of his adjudication at Llandudno Magistrates’ Court on 23rd September 2020...
-
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights, 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] UKFTT 460 (GRC)
On hearing the Appellant in person and reading the written representations on behalf of the Respondent, the Tribunal unanimously determines that: (1) The requests to which the appeal relates were...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 3174 (Admin)
The Hon. Mr Justice Bourne: Introduction 1. This is a renewed application for judicial review, permission having been refused on the papers by Heather Williams J on 5.7.22. 2. The...
-
High Court (Planning Court), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 3172 (Admin)
Mr Justice Chamberlain: Introduction 1 This is an appeal by case stated from a decision of District Judge Layton (“the judge”), sitting at North Somerset Magistrates’ Court, on 24 January...
-
First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] UKFTT 472 (TC)
Introduction 1. The form of the hearing was V (video) using HMCTS video hearing service. The documents to which I was referred are an electronic hearing bundle of 238 pages,...
-
High Court (Business List), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 3180 (Ch)
Heading Starting Paragraph 1. INTRODUCTION1 2. THE EVIDENCE7 3. FACTUAL BACKGROUND16 4. THE ALLEGED AGREEMENTS36 (A) The 1996 Alleged Agreement36 (B) The 1996 Alleged Agreement38 (C) How to choose between...
-
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights, 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] UKFTT 475 (GRC)
MODE OF HEARING 1. The proceedings were held via the Cloud Video Platform. The parties joined remotely. The Commissioner did not attend. The Tribunal was satisfied that it was fair...
-
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights, 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] UKFTT 469 (GRC)
Mode of hearing 1. The proceedings were held by video (CVP). All parties joined remotely. The Tribunal was satisfied that it was fair and just to conduct the hearing in...
-
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] UKUT 330 (AAC)
The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the Secretary of State’s appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 31 May 2022 under case number SC299/21/00158 did...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 2929 (Ch)
Her Honour Judge Claire Jackson: 1. This is a dispute between Rail for London Limited (“RfL”) and TTL Properties Limited (“TTL”) as former and current tenants respectively (collectively “the Claimants”),...
-
High Court (Senior Court Costs Office), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 3354 (SCCO)
Costs Judge Rowley: 1. This is an appeal by Mark Friend of counsel against the decision of the determining officer not to make a cracked trial fee payment under the...
-
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] UKFTT 463 (GRC)
1. The appeal is dismissed. REASONS Mode of hearing 2. The parties and the Tribunal agreed that this matter was suitable for determination on the papers in accordance with rule...
-
High Court (Planning Court), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 3175 (Admin)
This judgment was handed down by the Judge remotely by circulation to the parties' representatives by email and release to The National Archives. The date and time for hand-down is...
-
High Court (King's Bench Division), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 3162 (KB)
Mrs Justice Ellenbogen DBE : Introduction 1. With the permission of Steyn J, the Appellant appeals from the judgment of the County Court at Norwich (HHJ Pugh - ‘the Judgment’),...
-
High Court (Senior Court Costs Office), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 3350 (SCCO)
Costs Judge Rowley: 1. This is an appeal by Asghar and Co solicitors against the classification of offence used by the determining officer in calculating the Litigators Graduated Fee in...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 12 décembre 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 3173 (Admin)
Judge O’Connor: Introduction 1. This is an application for judicial review of the Secretary of State’s decision of 5 May 2022 (“the Decision”) to revoke the Claimant’s licence and recall...