DN Autos v The Environment Agency
1. The Appellant lodged an appeal using the GRC1 form on 7 January 2025. The appeal was incomplete as the Appellant did not include a copy of the decision notice they sought to challenge, which was referred to in the form as SORTATION REF 601 dated 6 December 2024. 2. By Directions dated 14 April 2025 the Appellant was required...
2 min de lecture · 224 mots
1. The Appellant lodged an appeal using the GRC1 form on 7 January 2025. The appeal was incomplete as the Appellant did not include a copy of the decision notice they sought to challenge, which was referred to in the form as SORTATION REF 601 dated 6 December 2024. 2. By Directions dated 14 April 2025 the Appellant was required to provide a copy of the decision to the Tribunal by 28 April 2025. The Appellant provided several documents in response to these directions, including a warning letter and invoice from the Environment Agency, but still did not provide a copy of the Decision Notice that it wished to challenge. 3. By Directions dated 20 June 2025, the Appellant was directed by 7 July 2025 to obtain and provide a Decision Notice from the Environment Agency dated 6 December 2024 or provide further clarification of the exact documents the Environment Agency issues when imposing a financial penalty. 4. The Appellant was directed to note that failure to comply with the Direction could lead to the Tribunal striking out the appeal for failure to comply without further direction. 5. The Appellant failed to comply with the Direction dated 20 June 2025 and accordingly there are grounds to strike out the appeal.
Sources officielles : consulter la page source
Open Justice Licence (The National Archives).
Articles similaires
A propos de cette decision
Décisions similaires
Royaume-Uni
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights
Beacon Counselling Trust v The Information Commissioner & Anor
Introduction to the Appeal 1. On 23 May 2024, the Appellant submitted a request (“the Request”) to the Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (“the Trust”) for copies of correspondence making reference to the Appellant, which had been sent to or from a named person at the Trust from 1 February 2023 to the date of the Request. 2....
Royaume-Uni
High Court (Chancery Division)
Kalaivani Jaipal Kirishani v George Major
Sir Anthony Mann : Introduction 1. This is an appeal from an order of HHJ Gerald sitting in the County Court at Central London dated 23rd December 2024 in which he dismissed two of three claims made by Ms Kirishana as claimant against her former cohabitee Mr Major. The claims were for a contribution to household and other domestic expenses,...
Royaume-Uni
High Court (Insolvency and Companies List)
Joanna Rich v JDDR Capital Limited
ICC JUDGE AGNELLO KC: Introduction 1. This is the judgment in relation to an application to set aside a statutory demand against Mrs Joanna Rich (Mrs Rich) and a petition against Mr Clive Rich (Mr Rich) relating to the same debt claimed under a personal guarantee provided by them in relation to a loan granted to LawBit Limited (Lawbit). Mr...