Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
High Court (Senior Court Costs Office), 18 mai 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1272 (SCCO)
Costs Judge Rowley: 1. This is an appeal by Newgate solicitors against the number of pages of prosecution evidence (“PPE”) allowed by the determining officer when calculating the appropriate fee...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 18 mai 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1220 (Ch)
MRS JUSTICE FALK: Introduction and background 1. This is an appeal by Tik Tok International Limited against a decision dated 16 December 2021 of June Ralph, the Hearing Officer for...
-
Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 18 mai 2022, n° [2022] UKUT 129 (LC)
Introduction 1. This is an appeal by the ratepayer against a decision of the Valuation Tribunal for England (“the VTE”), dated 1 February 2021, in which it dismissed an appeal...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 18 mai 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1124 (QB)
This judgment was handed down by the Judge remotely by circulation to the parties’ representatives by e-mail and release to The National Archives. The date and time for hand-down is...
-
First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber), 18 mai 2022, n° [2022] UKFTT 168 (TC)
Introduction 1. This is an appeal by Haymarket Media Group Limited against a notice of assessment to VAT dated 18 January 2019 in the sum of £17,000,000 for the period...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 18 mai 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1162 (Ch)
This judgment will be handed down by the Judge remotely by circulation to the parties or representatives by email and release to The National Archives. The date and time for...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 18 mai 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1108 (QB)
Mr Justice Lane : 1. On 10 December 2016, a football match took place at Motspur Park, London between the under 18 teams of Fulham Football Club and Swansea City...
-
High Court (Senior Court Costs Office), 18 mai 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1273 (SCCO)
Costs Judge Rowley: 1. This is an appeal by Philip Rule of counsel against the fees allowed to him in respect of an appeal to the Court of Appeal by...
-
Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), 18 mai 2022, n° [2022] UKUT 139 (TCC)
Introduction and background 1. This decision deals with the appellants’ objection to HMRC raising two particular issues in its Rule 24 Rule 24 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules...
-
United Kingdom Supreme Court, 18 mai 2022, n° [2022] UKSC 13
SIR DECLAN MORGAN: (with whom Lord Hodge, Lord Hamblen, Lord Burrows and Lord Lloyd-Jones agree) 1. The appellant pleaded guilty at arraignment on charges of aggravated burglary and stealing, false...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 18 mai 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1149 (Admin)
Mr Justice Julian Knowles: Introduction 1. This is a renewed application for permission to appeal against the order for the Applicant’s extradition to Hungary following refusal on the papers by...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 18 mai 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1189 (QB)
Introduction 1 The background to this claim is described in a judgment handed down on 22 February 2022 and made public on 24 February 2022: [2022] EWHC 380 (QB) (“the...
-
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 18 mai 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Crim 678
This judgment was handed down remotely by circulation to the parties' representatives by email and release to The National Archives. The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 mai 2022, n° 388/20.7GDSTB.S1
Relator: HELENA FAZENDA. I - A opera??o de determina??o da medida concreta da pena tem de ser realizada em fun??o da culpa do agente ? que funciona, tamb?m, como limite...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 mai 2022, n° 98/18.5PATVR.E1.S1
Relator: HELENA FAZENDA. I - No que respeita ? decis?o sobre a pena, mormente a sua medida, o STJ tem reafirmado que os recursos n?o s?o re-julgamentos da causa, mas...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 mai 2022, n° 1537/20.0GLSNT.L1.S1
Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. A sindicabilidade da medida concreta da pena em recurso abrange a determina??o da pena que desrespeite os princ?pios gerais respectivos, as opera??es de determina??o impostas por...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 mai 2022, n° 365/18.8PFPRT-A.S1
Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. No iter aplicativo da pena, a atenua??o especial surge na fase da determina??o das penas parcelares, sendo esse o momento em que o tribunal pondera sobre...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 mai 2022, n° 85/15.5GEBRG.G1.S1
Relator: S?NIO ALVES. A discord?ncia relativamente ao ac?rd?o que determinou a rejei??o do recurso interposto, por inadmiss?vel, sendo leg?tima, n?o constitui fundamento de qualquer nulidade.
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 mai 2022, n° 2808/13.8TAVNG.P1.S1
Relator: S?NIO ALVES. I - A omiss?o de pron?ncia constitui um v?cio da decis?o que se verifica quando o tribunal se n?o pronuncia sobre quest?es cujo conhecimento a lei lhe...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 mai 2022, n° 106/20.0KRCBR.C1.S1
Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - Entende a recorrente que o ac?rd?o recorrido enferma, no que concerne ? fixa??o da pena ?nica, de falta de fundamenta??o, o que consubstancia nulidade do...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 mai 2022, n° 48/17.6GCALM.L1-A.S1
Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - O ?mbito do presente recurso cinge-se ? mat?ria c?vel (art. 403.?, n.? 2, al. b), do CPP). II - Pretende a recorrente que seja admitida...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 mai 2022, n° 3/15.0IFLSB.L1.S1
Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - Disp?e o art. 400.?, n.? 3, do CPP; ?mesmo que n?o seja admiss?vel recurso quanto ? mat?ria penal, pode ser interposto recurso da parte da...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 mai 2022, n° 2711/20.5T8STR.E1.S1
Relator: LOPES DA MOTA. I - Sendo a data do tr?nsito em julgado da primeira condena??o o momento temporal a ter em conta (ac?rd?o de fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia n.? 9/2016,...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 mai 2022, n° 37/20.3PJLRS-A.S1
Relator: PEDRO BRANQUINHO DIAS. I. A provid?ncia do Habeas corpus tem natureza extraordin?ria e ? independente do sistema de recursos penais. II. Em conson?ncia com a sua matriz hist?rica, deve...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 mai 2022, n° 1649/19.3JAPRT-A.S1
Relator: TERESA F?RIA. I - O peticionante fundamenta o seu pedido de concess?o da provid?ncia de Habeas corpus na invoca??o da ilegalidade da sua reclus?o, por, em seu entender, esta...
-
Bundesgerichtshof, 18 mai 2022, n° VII ZB 40/21
Tenor Die Rechtsbeschwerde der Kläger gegen den Beschluss des 15. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts München vom 15. Juni 2021 wird auf Kosten der Kläger als unzulässig verworfen. Gegenstandswert: bis 25.000 €...
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 18 mai 2022, n° 2021-01012
Cour supérieure de justice, 18 mai 2022, n° 2021-01012
-
Rechtbank Midden-Nederland, 18 mai 2022, n° 16/196226-20
Vrijspraak: primaire feit verkrachting. Bewezenverklaring: subsidiair plegen handelingen die bestonden uit seksueel binnendringen van een fysiek onmachtige (art. 243 Sr). Aangeefster betrouwbaar en voldoende steunbewijs. DNA. Straf: 12 maanden gevangenisstraf
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 18 mai 2022, n° 2022-00192
Cour supérieure de justice, 18 mai 2022, n° 2022-00192
-
Rechtbank Oost-Brabant, 18 mai 2022, n° C/01/376278 / HA ZA 21-775
Handelszaak. WAMCA. Collectieve vordering van vakbonden over voortzetting van de deelneming aan het pensioenfonds na overgang van onderneming. In dit tussenvonnis komen een aantal voorvragen aan bod: de ontvankelijkheid van...