Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 22 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 949 (Ch)
Mr Justice Nugee: Introduction 1. This is an appeal against a Determination of the Pensions Ombudsman, Mr Anthony Arter, (“the Ombudsman”) dated 12 December 2019 in which he decided in...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 22 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 951 (Ch)
1. The issues 1. The Defendant (“D”) has applied for summary judgment or a strike out of the claim brought by the Claimant (“C”) for losses she sustained in the...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 22 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 958 (Admin)
Mrs Justice Andrews: INTRODUCTION 1. This is a claim for statutory review under s.288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 of the decision of the Defendant’s Planning Inspector...
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 22 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 778 (Comm)
1. This is the judgment of the court on two linked applications: i) the application of the defendant dated 25 February 2020 for an order that unless the claimant pays...
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 22 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 916 (Comm)
1. This judgment seeks to determine a question which has been “referred” to the English Court by the Belgian Court. 2. The immediate context in which that unusual, perhaps unprecedented,...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 22 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1335 (Admin)
MR JUSTICE FORDHAM : 1. This is an application for bail pursuant to section 22 subsection 1A of the Criminal Justice Act 1967. It is common ground that that jurisdiction...
-
High Court (Family Division), 22 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1116 (Fam)
1 This is an application brought by the applicant Mr X against the respondent Miss Y to rectify, as he sees it, a decree of divorce granted in relation to...
-
High Court (Family Division), 22 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWFC 30
1. The court has before it an application for a declaration of non-paternity in respect of two children, A, who was born in 2005 and now aged 15, and B,...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 22 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWCA Civ 547
Lord Justice David Richards: Introduction 1. These appeals are concerned with corporation tax and derivative contracts. Although this is a combination likely to appear daunting, the issues of statutory construction...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 22 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 957 (Admin)
1. In R v South Gloucestershire Education Appeals Committee ex parte Bryant [2001] ELR 53, Buxton LJ observed: “Nobody who has had any sorts of dealings with educational matters …...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 22 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1871 (Ch)
1 This is my judgment following a hearing in these claims held on 20 and 21 April 2020. The hearing took place during the Covid-2019 lockdown period and was conducted...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 22 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1340 (Admin)
1. This is a renewed application for permission for judicial review. Permission was refused on the papers by Mrs Justice Steyn on 6 December 2019. She did so on the...
-
High Court (Family Division), 22 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWFC 33
1. The court is concerned with issues that have arisen relating to a prospective application for an adoption order under the 1993 Hague Convention (Convention of 29 May 1993 on...
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 22 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 952 (Comm)
1. This is the reserved judgment on the defendant’s application dated 7 November 2019 (the “Set Aside Application”) to set aside the order of Teare J of 17 October 2019...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 avril 2020, n° 4993/13.0TDLSB-J.S1
Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I -??? Em conformidade com os arts. 27.?, n.? 2 e 28.?, 31.?, da CRP, e art. 5?, da CEDH, a provid?ncia de habeas corpus tem a...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 avril 2020, n° 167/11.2TXEVR-Q.S1
Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - ? Tendo sido proferida decis?o judicial no sentido de se executar a pena acess?ria de expuls?o do territ?rio nacional em que o requerente foi condenado,...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 avril 2020, n° 634/15.9PAOLH.S1
Relator: NUNO GON?ALVES. I - ?Decorrido o prazo da pena suspensa sem que o tribunal da condena??o a tenha revogado ou julgado extinta, n?o deve efetuar-se c?mulo jur?dico de penas...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 avril 2020, n° 63/17.0T9LRS.L1.S1
Relator: NUNO GON?ALVES. I - Regulamentando o direito ao recurso, o CPP consagra o princ?pio da recorribilidade das decis?es proferidas no processo penal ? art. 399.? -, n?o admitindo limita??es...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 avril 2020, n° 499/18.9YRLSB.S1
Relator: RAUL BORGES. I ? O pedido foi formulado para efeitos de procedimento criminal, destinando-se ?? condu??o de um processo criminal?, para utilizar a terminologia do artigo 2.?, n.? 1,...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 avril 2020, n° 87/17.7SWLSB.1.L1.S1
Relator: RAUL BORGES. I ? A quest?o da falta de indica??o de interposi??o de recurso coloca-se, atenta a dist?ncia temporal entre a data da decis?o condenat?ria e o tr?nsito em...
-
Tribunal fédéral suisse, 22 avril 2020, n° 1B 165-2020
Bundesgericht Tribunal fédéral Tribunale federale Tribunal federal 1B_165/2020 Urteil vom 22. April 2020 I. öffentlich-rechtliche Abteilung Besetzung Bundesrichter Chaix, Präsident, Gerichtsschreiber Pfäffli. Verfahrensbeteiligte A.________, Beschwerdeführer. Gegenstand Strafverfahren. In Erwägung, dass...
-
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 22 avril 2020, n° 1 BvR 635/20
Ablehnungsgesuch offensichtlich unzulässig und Verfassungsbeschwerde nicht angenommen
-
Cour suprême de Finlande, 22 avril 2020, n° R2020/190
Kysymys luovuttamispäätöksen täytäntöönpanon lykkäämisestä.
-
Hoge Raad, 21 avril 2020, n° 18/05294
Economische zaak. Opzettelijk militaire goederen zonder vergunning doorvoeren in Nederland, begaan door rechtspersoon (professionele luchtvrachtvervoerder), art. 3:1 Algemene Douanewet. Heeft verdachte opzet gehad op militaire aard van door haar vervoerde...
-
Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden, 21 avril 2020, n° 19/00059
Schenkbelasting. Bedrijfsopvolgingsfaciliteit. Vastgoedportefeuille. Materiële onderneming? Meer dan normaal vermogensbeheer?
-
Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden, 21 avril 2020, n° 19/00060
Schenkbelasting. Bedrijfsopvolgingsfaciliteit. Vastgoedportefeuille. Materiële onderneming? Meer dan normaal vermogensbeheer?
-
Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden, 21 avril 2020, n° 19/00061
Verzoek geruisloze terugkeer. Vastgoedportefeuille. Materiële onderneming? Meer dan normaal vermogensbeheer?
-
Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden, 21 avril 2020, n° 19/00243
Schenkbelasting. Tijdelijk verruimde vrijstelling. Deel verbouwingskosten vóór schenking betaald. Volgtijdig verband is niet vereist. Belanghebbende heeft daarentegen niet aannemelijk gemaakt dat op het moment van ondertekening van de opdrachtbevestiging voor...
-
Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden, 21 avril 2020, n° 19/00423
IB/PVV. Bevoegdheid tot navordering. Kenbare fout?
-
Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden, 21 avril 2020, n° 18/00455
Erfbelasting. Ontvankelijkheid bezwaar. Tijdige terpostbezorging niet aannemelijk gemaakt.