Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 24 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 396 (Admin)
MR JUSTICE SWIFT: A. Introduction 1. The First Claimant challenges the decision of the Financial Conduct Authority’s Regulatory Decisions Committee (“the FCA” and “the RDC”, respectively) to refuse his application...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 24 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 403 (Ch)
Mr Justice Trower: 1. In these proceedings JSC Commercial Bank Privatbank (the “Bank”) claims that its former majority shareholders, the first defendant, (“Mr Kolomoisky”) and the second defendant (“Mr Bogolyubov”)...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 24 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 294 (Ch)
David Stone (sitting as Deputy High Court Judge) : 1. “Bodycon” and “bandage” are two dress styles made popular by celebrities including Jennifer Lopez, Beyoncé and Kim Kardashian. As the...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 24 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 398 (Ch)
MR JUSTICE MORGAN: Introduction 1. The principal claimants are Mr Abdulrida, Mr Al-Habib and Mr Khurshed, who are three Kuwaiti businessmen and investors. The principal defendant, Mr Al-Najar, was involved...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 24 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 376 (Admin)
1. The appellant, Dr Clay Kumar Teewary, (also known as Dr Kumar Pratyash), is a medical doctor. On 20 November 2020 a tribunal (“the Tribunal”) of the Medical Practitioners Tribunal...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 24 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 408 (Admin)
1. In this matter the Claimant seeks judicial review of the Defendant’s refusal to return his British passport to him. BACKGROUND 2. The Claimant is a British citizen whose stated...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 24 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 392 (Ch)
Mr Justice Adam Johnson: Introduction and Background 1. Mr Khadzi-Murat Derev was declared bankrupt in Russia in July 2019, and the present Applicant Mr Protasov was appointed his bankruptcy manager....
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 24 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 370 (Admin)
1. This is an appeal from a decision (“the Decision”) of the Professional Conduct Committee (“the Committee”) of the General Osteopathic Council (“the Council”) dated 24 August 2020. By the...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 24 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 366 (Admin)
Mr Justice Julian Knowles: Double-click to enter the short title 1. The Appellant’s extradition has been sought by Latvia. On 11 July 2020 we dismissed his appeal against the order...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 24 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 402 (QB)
MR JUSTICE FORDHAM : 1. The purpose of today’s hearing is for me to consider whether the proposed settlement of the damages claim in this case is in the best...
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 24 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 411 (Comm)
1. PJSC Tatneft ("Tatneft") brings this claim as assignee of Kompaniya Suvar-Kazan LLC ("S-K"). 2. Tatneft is a publicly traded joint stock company incorporated in Tatarstan, a constituent Republic of...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 24 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWCA Civ 227
LADY JUSTICE CARR DBE: Introduction 1. This appeal concerns the application of the doctrine of restraint of trade ("the doctrine") in the context of a bespoke services agreement entered into...
-
High Court (Family Division), 24 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWFC 21
1. This is an application for financial provision for a child pursuant to Schedule 1 and s. 15 of the Children Act 1989. E is now 4 years old. Her...
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 24 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 349 (Comm)
1. This is the hearing of two applications by the Claimant (“NUFC”) being: i) An application by NUFC under section 24(1)(a) of the Arbitration Act 1996 (“AA”), made by way...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 24 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 371 (Admin)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: SHIVA LIMITED Appellant - and – SHARON BOYD...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 24 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 384 (QB)
I. Overview: paras. [1-6] II. Legal Principles: paras. [7-13] III. Meaning: paras. [14-25] IV. Fact/Opinion and defamatory tendency: paras. [26-30] Appendix: the Article I.Overview 1. This is a trial of...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 7447/08.2TDLSB.L1.S1
Relator: S?NIO ALVES. I - Nos termos do disposto no art. 400.?, n.? 1, al. e), do CPP, n?o ? admiss?vel recurso ?de ac?rd?os proferidos, em recurso, pelas rela??es que...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 95/12.4GAILH-A.S1
Relator: NUNO GON?ALVES. I - O instituto do caso julgado ? orientado pela ideia de conseguir maior seguran?a e paz nas rela??es jur?dicas, bem como maior prest?gio e rendimento da...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 34/11.0TAAGH.L1.S1
Relator: NUNO GON?ALVES. I - Em recurso, os poderes de cogni??o do STJ circunscrevem-se ao reexame de quest?es de direito. II - Detetando na decis?o recorrida, enquanto pe?a processual aut?noma,...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 43/12.1JDLSB.S1
Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - A medida da pena conjunta deve definir-se entre um m?nimo imprescind?vel ? estabiliza??o das expetativas comunit?rias e um m?ximo consentido pela culpa do agente. II...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 260/11.1JASTB-A.S1
Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - Na previs?o normativa do art. 449.?, n.? 1, al. c) do CPP, para que haja fundamento para a admissibilidade da revis?o de senten?a transitada em...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 1498/20.6JABRG-D.S1
Relator: PAULO FERREIRA DA CUNHA. I - Na presente provid?ncia de Habeas Corpus, h? apenas que determinar, como o fundamento da peti??o se refere especificamente ? situa??o processual do requerente...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 31/20.4YFLSB
Relator: PAULA S? FERNANDES. I. N?o se verifica qualquer erro sobre os pressupostos do ato impugnado na subsun??o da conduta do requerente na al?nea l) do n.? 3 do art....
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 15/20.2YFLSB
Relator: IL?DIO SACARR?O MARTINS. I. A prescri??o do procedimento disciplinar suspende-se durante o tempo em que, por for?a de decis?o jurisdicional ou de aprecia??o jurisdicional de qualquer quest?o, a marcha...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 8/20.0YFLSB
Relator: OLIVEIRA ABREU. I. Ap?s participa??o disciplinar, o interesse primordial que poder? estar em causa ? um interesse p?blico no correto exerc?cio da a??o disciplinar - e que esse interesse...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 44/20.6YFLSB
Relator: MARIA OLINDA GARCIA. I. O n.? l do art. 121.? do CPTA permite a convola??o do objeto do processo cautelar no objeto do processo declarativo, com a manuten??o da...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 27/20.6YFLSB
Relator: ROSA TCHING. I. O direito ? audi??o dos interessados, previamente ? tomada de decis?es administrativas suscet?veis de afetar os seus interesses, funda-se no princ?pio constitucional da participa??o dos cidad?os,...
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 февраля 2021, n° 2019-00504
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 février 2021, n° 2019-00504
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 февраля 2021, n° 2019-01045
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 février 2021, n° 2019-01045
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 февраля 2021, n° 2019-01089
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 février 2021, n° 2019-01089