Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 24 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 384 (QB)
I. Overview: paras. [1-6] II. Legal Principles: paras. [7-13] III. Meaning: paras. [14-25] IV. Fact/Opinion and defamatory tendency: paras. [26-30] Appendix: the Article I.Overview 1. This is a trial of...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 7447/08.2TDLSB.L1.S1
Relator: S?NIO ALVES. I - Nos termos do disposto no art. 400.?, n.? 1, al. e), do CPP, n?o ? admiss?vel recurso ?de ac?rd?os proferidos, em recurso, pelas rela??es que...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 95/12.4GAILH-A.S1
Relator: NUNO GON?ALVES. I - O instituto do caso julgado ? orientado pela ideia de conseguir maior seguran?a e paz nas rela??es jur?dicas, bem como maior prest?gio e rendimento da...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 34/11.0TAAGH.L1.S1
Relator: NUNO GON?ALVES. I - Em recurso, os poderes de cogni??o do STJ circunscrevem-se ao reexame de quest?es de direito. II - Detetando na decis?o recorrida, enquanto pe?a processual aut?noma,...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 43/12.1JDLSB.S1
Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - A medida da pena conjunta deve definir-se entre um m?nimo imprescind?vel ? estabiliza??o das expetativas comunit?rias e um m?ximo consentido pela culpa do agente. II...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 260/11.1JASTB-A.S1
Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - Na previs?o normativa do art. 449.?, n.? 1, al. c) do CPP, para que haja fundamento para a admissibilidade da revis?o de senten?a transitada em...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 1498/20.6JABRG-D.S1
Relator: PAULO FERREIRA DA CUNHA. I - Na presente provid?ncia de Habeas Corpus, h? apenas que determinar, como o fundamento da peti??o se refere especificamente ? situa??o processual do requerente...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 31/20.4YFLSB
Relator: PAULA S? FERNANDES. I. N?o se verifica qualquer erro sobre os pressupostos do ato impugnado na subsun??o da conduta do requerente na al?nea l) do n.? 3 do art....
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 15/20.2YFLSB
Relator: IL?DIO SACARR?O MARTINS. I. A prescri??o do procedimento disciplinar suspende-se durante o tempo em que, por for?a de decis?o jurisdicional ou de aprecia??o jurisdicional de qualquer quest?o, a marcha...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 8/20.0YFLSB
Relator: OLIVEIRA ABREU. I. Ap?s participa??o disciplinar, o interesse primordial que poder? estar em causa ? um interesse p?blico no correto exerc?cio da a??o disciplinar - e que esse interesse...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 44/20.6YFLSB
Relator: MARIA OLINDA GARCIA. I. O n.? l do art. 121.? do CPTA permite a convola??o do objeto do processo cautelar no objeto do processo declarativo, com a manuten??o da...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 24 февраля 2021, n° 27/20.6YFLSB
Relator: ROSA TCHING. I. O direito ? audi??o dos interessados, previamente ? tomada de decis?es administrativas suscet?veis de afetar os seus interesses, funda-se no princ?pio constitucional da participa??o dos cidad?os,...
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 февраля 2021, n° 2019-00504
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 février 2021, n° 2019-00504
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 февраля 2021, n° 2019-01045
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 février 2021, n° 2019-01045
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 февраля 2021, n° 2019-01089
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 février 2021, n° 2019-01089
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 февраля 2021, n° 2020-00065
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 février 2021, n° 2020-00065
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 февраля 2021, n° 2020-00645
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 février 2021, n° 2020-00645
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 февраля 2021, n° 2020-00979
Cour supérieure de justice, 24 février 2021, n° 2020-00979
-
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 24 февраля 2021, n° 2 BvR 496/18
Parallelentscheidung zum Nichtannahmebeschluss im Verfahren 2 BvR 428/18
-
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 24 февраля 2021, n° 2 BvR 428/18
Nichtannahme einer mangels hinreichender Darlegungen zur Fristwahrung unzulässigen Verfassungsbeschwerde
-
Cour de cassation, 24 февраля 2021, n° 31504/2021
Arrêt de cassation n ° 31504 du 24 février 2021 - foncier - Tunisie
-
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 23 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWCA Crim 201
Lady Justice Macur: 1. This appellant’s two convictions of indecent assault on 19 February 2004 are referred by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) pursuant to section 9 of the...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 23 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 380 (QB)
MR JUSTICE FORDHAM : Introduction 1. By an application dated 7 December 2020 and served on 11 December 2020 the Claimant seeks to set aside an order of Johnson J...
-
High Court (Family Division), 23 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 440 (Fam)
1. This is an application by the London Borough of X for orders permitting the local authority a) to place a child Y outside of the jurisdiction, in Scotland, pursuant...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 23 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 379 (Ch)
MR JUSTICE SNOWDEN : 1. This is an application by MAB Leasing Limited (the “Company”) for an order sanctioning a scheme of arrangement (the “Scheme”) under Part 26 of the...
-
Court of Protection, 23 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWCOP 16
1. This is an urgent application brought by the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust. It concerns NZ, a woman in her early thirties, who is gravely ill with pneumonitis,...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 23 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWCA Civ 228
Lord Justice Newey: 1. This appeal concerns a “Tomlin” order made to dispose of proceedings which CFL Finance Limited (“CFL”) had brought against Mr Moises Gertner. It raises an important...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 23 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWCA Civ 194
Mr Justice Hayden: 1. This is an appeal from an order made by Mr Leslie Samuels QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court judge, on 20th November 2020. The judge...
-
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 23 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWCA Crim 261
1. LORD JUSTICE DAVIS: The Solicitor General seeks to challenge sentences on the grounds that they are unduly lenient. We grant leave in this case. There are three offenders concerned:...
-
Family Court (B - district and circuit judges), 23 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWFC 129 (B)
1 This is my judgment following a fact-finding hearing in care proceedings brought by a London local authority in relation to three children. The children are A, born in 2017;...