Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
Hoge Raad, 22 февраля 2022, n° 20/02389
Medeplegen diefstal met geweld, art. 312.2.2 Sr. Bewijsklacht medeplegen. HR herhaalt relevante overwegingen uit HR:2014:3474, HR:2015:718 en HR:2016:1316 m.b.t. medeplegen en i.h.b. de afbakening tussen medeplegen en medeplichtigheid. Hof heeft...
-
Hoge Raad, 22 февраля 2022, n° 20/03894
Invoer MDMA, art. 2.A Opiumwet. Afwijzing van bij appelschriftuur gedaan, op tz. in hoger beroep gehandhaafd en op nadere tz. in h.b. herhaald verzoek tot horen van 2 getuigen op...
-
Rechtbank Gelderland, 22 февраля 2022, n° C/05/399516 / KZ ZA 22-9
Vonnis in kort geding. Kunnen de trainers aanspraak maken op uitzending naar de toernooien van 3 tot 13 maart 2022? Discussie over de vraag of het betreffende besluit wel of...
-
Hoge Raad, 22 февраля 2022, n° 20/02272
Medeplegen opzettelijk vervoeren van 5 kg hennep (art. 3.B Opiumwet). Bewijsklacht medeplegen. Hof heeft in zijn bewijsoverweging gemotiveerd op grond waarvan naar zijn oordeel het medeplegen van het opzettelijk vervoeren...
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 22 февраля 2022
Cour supérieure de justice, 22 février 2022
-
Gerechtshof Amsterdam, 22 февраля 2022, n° 20/00238 en 20/00239
Douanerecht. Antidumpingrechten. Oorsprong? Welke douanewaarde? Welk tarief?
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 22 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 376 (Comm)
Covid-19 Protocol: This judgment was handed down by the judge remotely by circulation to the parties’ representatives by email and release to Bailii. The date and time for hand-down is...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 22 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 388 (Admin)
MR JUSTICE FORDHAM: Introduction 1. This is a case about local government reorganisation for Cumbria. It comes before the Court as a renewed application for permission for judicial review, permission...
-
Employment Appeal Tribunal, 22 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EAT 40
SUMMARY TOPIC NUMBERS : 11 – UNFAIR DISMISSAL; Constructive dismissal 8 – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE; Perversity appeal; Full hearing orders The Employment Tribunal found that the claimant had been constructively...
-
Employment Appeal Tribunal, 22 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EAT 67
SUMMARY WHISTLEBLOWING, PROTECTED DISCLOSURES It was common ground that the claimant in ongoing proceedings in the employment tribunal had brought complaints of detrimental treatment on grounds of protected disclosures and...
-
Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 22 февраля 2022, n° [2022] UKUT 42 (LC)
Introduction 1. This is an appeal from a decision of the First-tier Tribunal (“the FTT”) about the price payable on the enfranchisement of a block of flats. The appellant is...
-
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 22 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Crim 248
LORD JUSTICE SINGH: Introduction 1. The provisions of the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992 apply to this offence. Under those provisions, where a sexual offence has been committed against a...
-
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 22 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Crim 209
This judgment was handed down remotely by circulation to the parties’ representatives by email and released to BAILII. The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be 10:30am on...
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 22 февраля 2022
Cour supérieure de justice, 22 février 2022
-
Rechtbank Midden-Nederland, 22 февраля 2022, n° 16/228696-19
poging tot zware mishandeling door aangever uit het niets te slaan op het hoofd en vervolgens aangever te slaan en te schoppen op zijn lichaam terwijl hij op de grond...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 февраля 2022, n° 682/20.7T8BRG.G1.S1
Relator: J?LIO GOMES. A admissibilidade da revista excecional depende da verifica??o dos pressupostos comuns, designadamente os respeitantes ao valor da causa ou da sucumb?ncia (artigo 629.? n.? 1 do CPC).
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 февраля 2022, n° 2003/18.0T8BCL.G1.S1
Relator: J?LIO GOMES. N?o sendo admiss?vel recurso de revista, a decis?o do Tribunal da Rela??o que conheceu e negou a exist?ncia de quaisquer nulidades n?o ? sindic?vel por este Supremo...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 февраля 2022, n° 1276/16.7T8CSC.L2.S1
Relator: J?LIO GOMES. I- A reclama??o n?o ? um novo recurso e n?o ? o meio processualmente adequado para invocar uma alegada contradi??o entre o Ac?rd?o objeto da mesma e...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 февраля 2022, n° 1812/18.4T8BRR-C.L1.S1
Relator: PAULA S? FERNANDES. I- A Portaria n? 280/2013 assenta no pressuposto de que o processo ? eletr?nico e que os atos devem ser apresentados em ju?zo por via eletr?nica,...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 февраля 2022, n° 959/18.1T8BJA.E1.S2
Relator: PAULA S? FERNANDES. I- N?o existe qualquer contradi??o nos ac?rd?os invocados sobre o conceito de unidade econ?mica para efeitos de transmiss?o de estabelecimento, ao abrigo do artigo 285.? do...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 февраля 2022, n° 251/20.1T8PTM.E1.S2
Relator: J?LIO GOMES. N?o ? claramente necess?ria para uma melhor aplica??o do direito a aprecia??o da quest?o relativa ? interpreta??o de uma cl?usula de uma conven??o coletiva, relativamente ? qual...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 февраля 2022, n° 2191/19.8T8PDL.L1.S2
Relator: J?LIO GOMES. S?o normas inderrog?veis da lei portuguesa, mormente para efeitos de aplica??o do artigo 8.? n.? 1 do Regulamento Roma I, as que respeitam ? pr?pria exist?ncia de...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 февраля 2022, n° 10830/17.9T8PRT.P1.S2
Relator: J?LIO GOMES. O artigo 672.? n.? 2 do CPC exige? que o Recorrente identifique de modo preciso qual a quest?o (ou quest?es) em que seria necess?ria a interven??o do...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 февраля 2022, n° 4705/17.9T8VIS-K.C1.S1
Relator: LUIS ESP?RITO SANTO. I - Estando em causa na presente revista apenas a prola??o de decis?es interlocut?rias (isto ?, n?o finais), sendo paradigm?tico assinalar que a decis?o principal que...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 февраля 2022, n° 577/14.3TBALR-E.E1.S1
Relator: LUIS ESP?RITO SANTO. I - N?o havendo o recorrente colocado em crise os factos considerados pelo juiz a quo para fundamentar a sua decis?o de absolvi??o da inst?ncia dos...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 февраля 2022, n° 969/17.6T8AMT.P2.S1
Relator: RICARDO COSTA. O ac?rd?o do tribunal da Rela??o que se pronuncia em confer?ncia sobre as nulidades arguidas e imputadas a anterior ac?rd?o que reapreciou a decis?o de 1.? inst?ncia,...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 февраля 2022, n° 186/14.7TBAMR-H.G1.S1
Relator: RICARDO COSTA. A revista at?pica e restrita contemplada pelo art. 14.?, n.? 1, do CIRE, uma vez configurada ap?s convola??o oficiosa de revista interposta como excepcional tendo por base...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 февраля 2022, n° 19874/21.5T8LSB-A.L1.S1
Relator: MARIA OLINDA GARCIA. Os ac?rd?os do tribunal da Rela??o proferidos em Processo Especial de Revitaliza??o [PER], regulado nos arts. 17.?-A a 17.?-J do CIRE, s? s?o suscet?veis de recurso...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 февраля 2022, n° 2381/19.3T8VNG-E.P1.S1
Relator: MARIA OLINDA GARCIA. I - N?o se verifica a causa de nulidade prevista no art. 615.?, n.? 1, al. c), do CPC, quando o texto do ac?rd?o ? claro...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 22 февраля 2022, n° 850/16.6T8AMT-I.P1.S1
Relator: MARIA OLINDA GARCIA. A reclama??o para a Confer?ncia, na qual se invocam nulidades do ac?rd?o, deve demonstrar a verifica??o inequ?voca de alguma das hip?teses previstas no art. 615.?, n.?...