Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 29 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1334 (Admin)
MR JUSTICE FORDHAM: Introduction 1. I am adjourning this renewed application for permission to appeal in an extradition case, in very unusual circumstances. If I were satisfied that I had...
-
United Kingdom Supreme Court, 29 avril 2020, n° [2020] UKSC 17
LORD WILSON: (with whom Lady Hale, Lady Black, Lady Arden and Lord Kitchin agree) Introduction 1. This appeal requires the court again to consider one of the most controversial questions...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 29 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWCA Civ 562
Lady Justice Simler: Introduction 1. The appellant, Mr Beadle, is a taxpayer who participated in a tax avoidance scheme through a partnership, Ingenious Film Partners LLP (“the LLP”), which was...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 29 avril 2020, n° 547/17.0PDAMD.L1.S1
Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - ? A atenua??o especial da pena, conforme tem vindo a entender a jurisprud?ncia do STJ, no caso de concurso de crimes, as circunst?ncias suscet?veis de...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 29 avril 2020, n° 928/08.0TAVNF.G1.S1
Relator: LOPES DA MOTA. I - ?N?o ? admiss?vel recurso para o STJ do ac?rd?o do tribunal da Rela??o, proferido em recurso, que confirmou a condena??o em 1.? inst?ncia aplicando...
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 29 avril 2020, n° 2019-00230
Cour supérieure de justice, 29 avril 2020, n° 2019-00230
-
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 29 avril 2020, n° 2 BvR 672/20
Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen Aufrechterhaltung von Auslieferungshaft mangels hinreichend substantiierter Begründung unzulässig
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 29 avril 2020
Cour supérieure de justice, 29 avril 2020
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 29 avril 2020, n° 2018-00880
Cour supérieure de justice, 29 avril 2020, n° 2018-00880
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 29 avril 2020, n° 2019-00467
Cour supérieure de justice, 29 avril 2020, n° 2019-00467
-
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 29 avril 2020, n° 2 BvR 363/20
Antrag auf Prozesskostenhilfe mangels möglicher Verletzung von Grundrechten abgelehnt
-
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 29 avril 2020, n° 1 BvQ 44/20
Vorläufige Eröffnung der Möglichkeit, auf Antrag im Einzelfall Ausnahmen vom generellen Verbot von Gottesdiensten in Kirchen, Moscheen und Synagogen zuzulassen
-
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 29 avril 2020, n° 1 BvQ 47/20
Einstweilige Anordnung betreffend die Begrenzung der Öffnung der Ladengeschäfte, Einkaufszentren und Kaufhäuser des Einzelhandels auf eine Verkaufsfläche von höchstens 800 qm nach der Bayerischen Infektionsschutzmaßnahmenverordnung abgelehnt
-
Cour suprême administrative de Finlande, 28 avril 2020, n° 6118/1/18
Ändringssökanden hade anhållit om rättshjälp för att söka ändring i Migrationsverkets beslut, med vilket hens tredje ansökan om internationellt skydd hade avvisats utan prövning. Rättshjälpsbyrån hade avslagit ansökan. Byrån konstaterade...
-
Cour suprême administrative de Finlande, 28 avril 2020, n° 1394/3/18
Julkista hankintaa koskeva valitus A, Mieskonmäen Koulukuljetus -nimisen toiminimen haltijana Anssin Tilausliikenne Oy B, B -nimisen toiminimen haltijana Asia Valittaja Päätös, jota valitus koskee Markkinaoikeus 20.2.2018 nro 88/18 Asian aikaisempi...
-
Tribunal d'arrondissement, 28 avril 2020, n° 2020-03194
Tribunal d'arrondissement, 28 avril 2020, n° 2020-03194
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 28 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1011 (QB)
1. Mr Andrew Greystoke (“the Respondent”) has brought a Part 8 Claim against the Financial Conduct Authority (“the FCA”), pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation 2018 (EU) 2016/679 (“the...
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 28 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1014 (Comm)
MR JUSTICE BRYAN: A Introduction. A.1 The Applications 1. The parties appear before the Court on the hearing of the application of the Defendant (“Mr Manès”). He applies to strike...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 28 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1243 (Admin)
Annexe F to the Guidance, where it is said that there is no requirement to release from detention if there are reasons of public order not to do so. The...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 28 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1004 (Ch)
Mr Justice Zacaroli: Background 1. This is an application for a debarring order made in the context of three related actions: i) Action number BL-2018-000544, a derivative action in which...
-
High Court (Family Division), 28 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1012 (Fam)
Mr Justice Cobb: Introduction 1. This judgment concerns Samantha This is not her real name, but is the name she has chosen to be known by in this judgment. 2...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 28 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1008 (QB)
1. This is an employment law dispute in the financial services field. The main issues between the parties concern whether the employee was constructively dismissed, and if not, the enforceability...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 28 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWCA Civ 553
Lord Justice Flaux: Introduction 1. This appeal and cross appeal, with the permission of Underhill LJ and Singh LJ respectively, concern the appellant’s challenge to changes made by the respondent...
-
High Court (Intellectual Property Enterprise Court), 28 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 3863 (IPEC)
1. This is an action for infringement of UK registered trademarks, numbers 2296073 (‘073”) and 25484497 (“’497”) in the name of the claimant (“Ms George”). 2. This is the claimant’s...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 28 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1231 (Ch)
Mr Justice Fancourt and Master Kaye: 1. We have heard detailed argument, both orally and in careful written submissions for which we are both grateful, on the question of taking...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 28 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 992 (Admin)
1. This is my judgement upon a renewed application by the claimant for permission to bring judicial review proceedings to challenge the decision made by the defendant set out in...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 28 avril 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1017 (QB)
Introduction 1. This second judgment should be read with my first judgment of 24 March 2020 (neutral citation: [2020] EWHC 704 (QB)). In the first judgment, I gave my reasons...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 28 avril 2020, n° 28/06.7TELSB.L2. S1
Relator: MARGARIDA BLASCO. I. N?o ? admiss?vel o recurso, quando ? alegada viola??o de caso julgado, alegando que, em processo penal, ? aplic?vel subsidiariamente a norma prevista no artigo 629.?,...
-
Bundesfinanzhof, 28 avril 2020, n° VI R 50/17
Die Erschließung einer öffentlichen Straße steht nicht im räumlich-funktionalen Zusammenhang zum Haushalt des Steuerpflichtigen, der auf Grund öffentlich-rechtlicher Verpflichtung zum Erschließungsbeitrag herangezogen wird.
-
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 28 avril 2020, n° 1 BvR 899/20
Einstweilige Anordnung betreffend die Untersagung des Betriebs eines Fitnessstudios aufgrund der Corona-Verordnung BW abgelehnt