Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
Cour suprême de Finlande, 15 mars 2022, n° S2020/567
A:n työsopimukseen kiinteistönvälitysyhtiössä oli sisältynyt kilpailukieltoehto ja salassapitoehto, joiden rikkomisesta työsopimukseen oli sisällytetty sopimussakkoja koskevat määräykset. A oli perustanut työnantajan kanssa kilpailevan kiinteistönvälitysyrityksen, johon oli siirtynyt työnantajan välitettävänä olleita myyntikohteita....
-
Rechtbank Amsterdam, 14 mars 2022, n° 8375182 CV EXPL 20-4103
werkingssfeer cao voor de Bouwnijverheid/Bouw & Infra en aanverwante regelingen, isolatie-uitzondering, tussenvonnis
-
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 14 mars 2022, n° 1 BvR 1655/21
Berichtigung einer offenbaren Unrichtigkeit im Beschluss vom 7. Februar 2022
-
Cour suprême de Finlande, 14 mars 2022, n° S2021/29
Tingsrätten hade ålagt ett bolag att betala övertidsersättningar till en tidigare arbetstagare. Bolaget överklagade till hovrätten och ansåg att arbetstagarens fordringar gällande övertidsersättningarna var preskriberade med beaktande av den nya...
-
Cour suprême administrative de Finlande, 11 mars 2022, n° 21810/2021
Närings-, trafik- och miljöcentralen (NTM-centralen) förbjöd Raumo stad och Raumo Hamn Ab att fortsätta byggandet av en väg anlagd på bank och muddringen av ett vattenområde eftersom det skadade och...
-
Tribunal d'arrondissement, 11 mars 2022, n° 2021-10193
Tribunal d'arrondissement, 11 mars 2022, n° 2021-10193
-
First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber), 11 mars 2022, n° [2022] UKFTT 184 (TC)
Introduction 1. The Appellant (“One Call”) appeals against an information notice (“the Notice”) issued under paragraph 1, Schedule 36 of the Finance Act 2008 (“Schedule 36”) seeking information and documents...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 11 mars 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 540 (Admin)
MR JUSTICE FORDHAM: 1. This is a judicial determination on the papers, but where it is, in my judgment, appropriate to give reasons by way of a short judgment. The...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 11 mars 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 534 (Admin)
MR JUSTICE FORDHAM: Introduction 1. This is a claim for judicial review, arising out of the “Windrush Scandal” (see §2 below). The parties have drawn the Court’s attention to three...
-
High Court (Family Division), 11 mars 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 81 (Fam)
The Hon Mrs Justice Judd : 1. This is a fact-finding hearing in a complex dispute which involves not only the parents of the relevant children, but also the local...
-
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 11 mars 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Crim 430
LADY JUSTICE CARR: The provisions of the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992 apply to this offence. Under those provisions where a sexual offence has been committed against a person, no...
-
High Court (Family Division), 11 mars 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 526 (Fam)
The Hon Mrs Justice Judd : 1. This is an application by a father pursuant to the 1980 Hague Convention for the return of his son, born in October 2020...
-
Family Court, 11 mars 2022, n° [2022] EWFC 72
1. This is my judgment on an application under CA 1989, s14D for leave to discharge a special guardianship order. The child who is the subject of the proceedings is...
-
High Court (Planning Court), 11 mars 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 520 (Admin)
Mr C M G Ockelton : 1. This is an appeal pursuant to s 289 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against the decision of a Planning Inspector...
-
Family Court, 11 mars 2022, n° [2022] EWFC 176
1. This is my Judgment in the Financial Remedy dispute between S and S. I shall call the parties ‘the Husband’ and ‘the Wife’ respectively in the Judgment, without disrespect....
-
Family Court, 11 mars 2022, n° [2022] EWFC 25
Mr Justice MacDonald: INTRODUCTION 1. In this matter I am concerned with an application by Her Majesty’s Attorney General for an order committing Mr Elavi Dowie to prison for contempt...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 11 mars 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 310
This judgment was handed down remotely by circulation to the parties' representatives by email and release to Bailii. The date for hand-down is deemed to be on 11 March 2022....
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 11 mars 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 537 (Admin)
Note: This judgment was produced and approved by the Judge, after using voice-recognition software during an ex tempore judgment in a Coronavirus remote hearing. MR JUSTICE FORDHAM: 1. This was...
-
Hoge Raad, 11 mars 2022, n° 20/03684
Artikel 19b, lid 1, letter c, Wet LB (tekst 2012); prijsgeven van pensioen; overdracht van de pensioenverplichting; artikel 11, lid 1, letter c, Wet LB; aanspraak op (na-)indexatie.
-
Cour suprême de Finlande, 11 mars 2022, n° R2020/837
A hade gjort sig skyldig till mord samt vissa andra brott såsom nedsatt tillräknelig. Högsta domstolen ansåg att det inte förelåg grunder för att döma en nedsatt tillräknelig till livstids...
-
Hoge Raad, 11 mars 2022, n° 21/00875
Procesrecht. Voorlopig getuigenverhoor. Onvoldoende belang? Vereisten van art. 3:305a BW voor collectieve actie. Overgangsrecht.
-
Rechtbank Midden-Nederland, 10 mars 2022, n° C/16/526773 / KG ZA 21-494
Geen gevolgen weigering ongecensureerde dagvaarding te geven aan tussenkomende partij. Geen gevolgen weigering tussenkomende partij om toestemming ex 22 lid 6 Rv te geven. Geen ondeugdelijke beoordeling en gebrekkige motivering...
-
Tribunal d'arrondissement, 10 mars 2022
Tribunal d'arrondissement, 10 mars 2022
-
Tribunal d'arrondissement, 10 mars 2022
Tribunal d'arrondissement, 10 mars 2022
-
Tribunal d'arrondissement, 10 mars 2022
Tribunal d'arrondissement, 10 mars 2022
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 10 mars 2022, n° 2021-00108
Cour supérieure de justice, 10 mars 2022, n° 2021-00108
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 10 mars 2022, n° 2021-00331
Cour supérieure de justice, 10 mars 2022, n° 2021-00331
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 10 mars 2022, n° 2019-00416
Cour supérieure de justice, 10 mars 2022, n° 2019-00416
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 10 mars 2022, n° 2021-00110
Cour supérieure de justice, 10 mars 2022, n° 2021-00110
-
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber), 10 mars 2022, n° [2022] UKUT 77 (AAC)
The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 28 August 2020 under number SC007/20/00041 was made in error of...