Abdulasiis Abdulahi Mahamud v The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors

1. The Appellant lodged an appeal using the GRC1 form on 11 December 2025. The appeal was incomplete as the Appellant did not include a copy of the decision notice they sought to challenge. 2. By Directions and email dated 12 December 2025 the Appellant was required to provide a copy of the Decision Notice that it wished to challenge...

Source officielle

Calcul en cours 0

1. The Appellant lodged an appeal using the GRC1 form on 11 December 2025. The appeal was incomplete as the Appellant did not include a copy of the decision notice they sought to challenge. 2. By Directions and email dated 12 December 2025 the Appellant was required to provide a copy of the Decision Notice that it wished to challenge to the Tribunal within 28 days. The Appellant did not comply with that Direction. 3. By Directions dated 20 January 2026, the Appellant was directed by 3 February 2026 to provide a copy of the Decision Notice that it wished to challenge to the Tribunal. 4. The Appellant was directed to note that failure to comply with the Direction could lead to the Tribunal striking out the appeal for failure to comply without further direction. 5. On 30 January 2026 the Appellant sent a copy of a screenshot to the Tribunal of an email dated 19 November 2025. This was not a copy of the decision the Appellant sought to challenge, but confirmation from the Respondent that the Appellant had not appealed the decision to revoke their licence within the prescribed time and that accordingly the revocation had taken effect. 6. The Appellant failed to comply with the Direction dated 20 January 2026 in that they have not provided a copy of the decision they wish to challenge, and accordingly there are grounds to strike out the appeal.


Open Justice Licence (The National Archives).

A propos de cette decision

Décisions similaires

Royaume-Uni

First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights

Fiscal EN

Beacon Counselling Trust v The Information Commissioner & Anor

Introduction to the Appeal 1. On 23 May 2024, the Appellant submitted a request (“the Request”) to the Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (“the Trust”) for copies of correspondence making reference to the Appellant, which had been sent to or from a named person at the Trust from 1 February 2023 to the date of the Request. 2....

Royaume-Uni

High Court (Chancery Division)

Fiscal EN

Kalaivani Jaipal Kirishani v George Major

Sir Anthony Mann : Introduction 1. This is an appeal from an order of HHJ Gerald sitting in the County Court at Central London dated 23rd December 2024 in which he dismissed two of three claims made by Ms Kirishana as claimant against her former cohabitee Mr Major. The claims were for a contribution to household and other domestic expenses,...

Royaume-Uni

High Court (Insolvency and Companies List)

Commercial EN

Joanna Rich v JDDR Capital Limited

ICC JUDGE AGNELLO KC: Introduction 1. This is the judgment in relation to an application to set aside a statutory demand against Mrs Joanna Rich (Mrs Rich) and a petition against Mr Clive Rich (Mr Rich) relating to the same debt claimed under a personal guarantee provided by them in relation to a loan granted to LawBit Limited (Lawbit). Mr...

Analyse stratégique offerte

Envoyez vos pièces. Recevez une stratégie.

Transmettez-nous les pièces de votre dossier pénal. Maître Hassan KOHEN vous répond personnellement sous 24 heures avec une première analyse stratégique de votre situation.

  • Première analyse offerte et sans engagement
  • Réponse personnelle de l'avocat sous 24 heures
  • 100 % confidentiel, secret professionnel garanti
  • Jusqu'à 1 Go de pièces, dossiers et sous-dossiers acceptés

Cliquez ou glissez vos fichiers ici
Tous formats acceptes (PDF, Word, images, etc.)

Envoi en cours...

Vos donnees sont utilisees uniquement pour traiter votre demande. Politique de confidentialite.