Doodle MGT03 Limited v The Pensions Regulator

The appeal is struck out under rule 8(2)(a) of The Tribunal (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 (as amended) REASONS 1. The Appellant seeks to appeal against an Escalating Penalty Notice (‘EPN’) dated 31 December 2021. 2. On 9 March 2022, the Appellant submitted a Notice of Appeal seeking to raise a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with...

Source officielle

Calcul en cours 0

The appeal is struck out under rule 8(2)(a) of The Tribunal (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 (as amended) REASONS 1. The Appellant seeks to appeal against an Escalating Penalty Notice (‘EPN’) dated 31 December 2021. 2. On 9 March 2022, the Appellant submitted a Notice of Appeal seeking to raise a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with the EPN. 3. The Respondent submits that the Notice of Appeal should be struck out under rule 8(2)(a) of the Tribunal Rules as the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to determine it in the circumstances. 4. The Appellant was given the opportunity to make representations in relation to the proposed striking out in accordance with rule 8(4) of the Tribunal Rules. 5. The Appellant made such representations to the Tribunal on 13 April 2022. The Tribunal has carefully considered those representations. 6. Parliament has provided this Tribunal with jurisdiction to consider appeals against financial penalties imposed by The Pensions Regulator only when certain pre-conditions have been met. These pre-conditions include a requirement for the Regulator to have conducted a review of the EPN. 7. In this case, there has been no such review. The reason is that the Appellant’s request for a review was not made with 28 days of the EPN. As the Regulator explained to the Appellant in response to its belated request for a review, the Regulator has no power to extend the 28-day deadline. The Regulator could initiate its own review (under section 43(1)(b) of the Pensions Act 2008) but declined to do so. 8. In these circumstances, I conclude that the necessary conditions for referral to the Tribunal under section 44(2) of the Pensions Act 2008 have not been met: the Regulator has not reviewed the EPN. The Notice of Appeal must therefore be struck out under rule 8(2)(a) of the Tribunal Rules because the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to determine it. I have no discretion to do otherwise in this case. 9. Accordingly, I now strike out the Notice of Appeal and these proceedings are concluded. Dated: 21 July 2022 Signed: Alexandra Marks CBE(Recorder sitting as a Judge of the First Tier Tribunal)


Open Justice Licence (The National Archives).

A propos de cette decision

Décisions similaires

Royaume-Uni

First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights

Fiscal EN

Beacon Counselling Trust v The Information Commissioner & Anor

Introduction to the Appeal 1. On 23 May 2024, the Appellant submitted a request (“the Request”) to the Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (“the Trust”) for copies of correspondence making reference to the Appellant, which had been sent to or from a named person at the Trust from 1 February 2023 to the date of the Request. 2....

Royaume-Uni

High Court (Chancery Division)

Fiscal EN

Kalaivani Jaipal Kirishani v George Major

Sir Anthony Mann : Introduction 1. This is an appeal from an order of HHJ Gerald sitting in the County Court at Central London dated 23rd December 2024 in which he dismissed two of three claims made by Ms Kirishana as claimant against her former cohabitee Mr Major. The claims were for a contribution to household and other domestic expenses,...

Royaume-Uni

High Court (Insolvency and Companies List)

Commercial EN

Joanna Rich v JDDR Capital Limited

ICC JUDGE AGNELLO KC: Introduction 1. This is the judgment in relation to an application to set aside a statutory demand against Mrs Joanna Rich (Mrs Rich) and a petition against Mr Clive Rich (Mr Rich) relating to the same debt claimed under a personal guarantee provided by them in relation to a loan granted to LawBit Limited (Lawbit). Mr...

Analyse stratégique offerte

Envoyez vos pièces. Recevez une stratégie.

Transmettez-nous les pièces de votre dossier. Maître Hassan KOHEN vous répond personnellement sous 24 heures avec une première analyse stratégique de votre situation.

  • Première analyse offerte et sans engagement
  • Réponse personnelle de l'avocat sous 24 heures
  • 100 % confidentiel, secret professionnel garanti
  • Jusqu'à 1 Go de pièces, dossiers et sous-dossiers acceptés

Cliquez ou glissez vos fichiers ici
Tous formats acceptes (PDF, Word, images, etc.)

Envoi en cours...

Vos donnees sont utilisees uniquement pour traiter votre demande. Politique de confidentialite.